close
close

Kyle Clifford should have been drawn to court – who cares if he is in a wheelchair? |. Great Britain News

Why the animal that Kyle Clifford was allowed to protect against court when the judge gave him three life sentences for the slaughter of his ex -girlfriend, Louise Hunt, her sisters Hannah and their mother? Why this devil in human form allowed to treat in his cell, while the broken heart of John Hunt, husband of Carol and father to these two beautiful girls, read the statement in which he told Clifford about his broken life and said: “There will be no release for you. Hell’s screams, I hear them now. The red carpet will come out for you. “

Why clifford, now paralyzed after he tried to kill himself after the murders, not forced to look into the eyes of John Hunt and see his deadly soul, his tortured mind, his emptiness and a broken heart, which was shattered in so many pieces that he will be unlikely that he will be able to combine him. Why could John Hunt not make this psychopath understand what he took him?

If I had my way, I would pull Clifford into court – shouting if necessary. Because who cares, what he wants, how he feels. Who cares if he is in a wheelchair. He went there when, when he was a coward, he tried to kill himself after the murders.

This grotesque man decided to do something that is beyond bad, but he was never properly forced to confront him.

Because of this, Clifford lost his right to make elections about everything. So why was he allowed to hide from the people who were from the family he destroyed? Why was he allowed to avoid the moment of considering when he was publicly marked with a freak and a monster he was.

Judge Joel Bannathan earlier told the court that he was considering forcing Clifford into a room with a video link in Belmarsh, but he was worried that he would have taken the opportunity to disrupt the proceedings.

Sorry, but the video link is another air conditioning. And how could Clifford disturb the proceedings? He is disabled and in a wheelchair and is unable to hurt anyone. Now he can only scream, shout and rail in the world. And if he did it in court, then there should be Strand guards to gag to him.

And don’t tell me it’s degradation, because degradation is at least Clifford, which he deserves what he did. These poor women had to feel degraded and terrified when he brutalized them at the time before their death.

Poor Louise had to degrade when he raped her right after he killed her mother. What a clifford did this terrible day, means that he is no longer entitled to treat as a human being or to ensure their rights or choices. He is an animal, but he had a choice whether to appear in court.

And it’s not the only one. Axel Rudakubana, a killer from Southport, avoided facing the families of the victims, being convicted in the Crown Court in Liverpool for repeated screams. He should also have been gagged.

And he refrained and forced to stand and listen to the families of these little girls.

Thomas Cashman, a gunslinger who killed nine-year-old Olivia Pratt-Korbel, when he chased a drug seller, did not appear in court for his sentence.

Lucy Letby, who murdered seven children and tried to kill seven, was absent after her sentence.

Jordan McSweeney, who killed the law of the law of Zara Aleen, 35 years old when she returned home from the evening in 2022, was released before appearing in court.

So these great brave killers are hard enough to take their lives when nobody looks too cowardly yet to face the families that have ripped off.

Why does our justice system constantly seize the needs of criminals against the needs of their victims? If the family of someone who has been murdered wants a killer in court, then he should be there – without a quarrel.

Because if this helps them come to terms with what happened, that’s all that counts. Nobody cares how the killers feel or what they want and it should never be considered. And yet it is like that in our justice system.

Downing Street this week blew up “cowardly killers who are too afraid to face justice”, but said that new legislation forcing them to do so would be part of the victims, courts and the Act on the protection of the Public Labor Party.

Well, better. It can’t be more big, big standing empty conversations from Starmer. The Act says that reasonable force can be used to attract killers to court if they refuse to come.

To the hell – any necessary force should be used to draw brutal killers into court. There should be no hideout from regret and anger of their victims.

Gerres